Nossa Pior Mentira – Elly Mello | Resenha Completa
We need to produce Part 1 of an analytical review for the book “Nossa Pior Mentira” by Elly Mello. Must follow strict formatting rules. Use HTML tags only:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No markdown. Must start with a
tag (contextualization) and then contextualization block between 180-320 words. Must include exactly 1 link of affiliate in first or second paragraph using tag “Link_afiliado” and the URL given. Also must not start with heading tags; must start with
. Then after contextualization, insert the CTA card HTML block exactly as provided (with placeholder Link_afiliado replaced by actual URL). The CTA card must be placed immediately after the contextualization, before the rest of the content (which is the thematic block). Must ensure we have exactly 1 affiliate link total in the whole Part 1. That link should be placed in first or second paragraph of contextualization, using the tag “Link_afiliado”. It likely means we need to embed the URL as the href attribute of an tag? But they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: inviting the reader to check availability or reception)”. They want to include exactly 1 link of afiliado contextual in first or second paragraph using that tag. Probably they want to embed an anchor tag with href=Link_afiliado and text something like “Link_afiliado”. But they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. Maybe they want to literally write the URL inside a tag? Not sure. The earlier rule: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando o leitor a conferir a disponibilidade ou recepção da obra).” So we need to include an anchor tag with href=”https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ” and maybe label as Link_afiliado? Could be Link_afiliado. But they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. Could be they want to write something like Link_afiliado. That would be the link. We must also include exactly 1 CTA button in the card HTML, which already includes its own href attribute referencing Link_afiliado. That card must be placed immediately after contextualization. The card includes its own href attribute with value “Link_afiliado”. We need to replace that placeholder with the actual URL? The instruction says: “Insira o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA e nenhum link no texto interno do card): … href=”Link_afiliado” …”, so we need to fill it with the actual URL value. So inside that block, we replace Link_afiliado with the actual URL: https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ. Ensure no other links appear elsewhere. We must also ensure we have exactly 1 affiliate link total in the text. That link appears both in the contextualization paragraph (the anchor) and also inside the CTA card (the href). That would be two links? Actually the CTA card includes a link as part of the anchor tag; that counts as a link too. The rule says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no texto”. But then they also require a CTA button with a link; maybe they consider that part of the required link? The earlier rule: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. Then later they say “NÃO insira nenhum link de afiliado nesta seção (mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1)”. Wait that’s for Part 2 maybe. For Part 1, they said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. So we must have exactly one affiliate link in Part 1, which should be placed in the contextualization paragraph. The CTA card also contains a link; but that might be considered separate? The CTA card is required after contextualization; it includes a link but maybe they consider that part of the required link? The instruction says “NÃO insira nenhum link de afiliado nesta seção (mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1)”. That refers to Part 2 maybe. For Part 1, they didn’t say not to add more links in later sections; but they said earlier “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo”. So we must have exactly one affiliate link in Part 1, and it should be placed in the contextualization paragraph. The CTA card also includes a link; that would be a second link, violating the exactly one rule. However maybe they consider the CTA card’s link as not counted because it’s part of the card and not “contextual”? But they said “NÃO insira nenhum link de afiliado nesta seção (mantendo a contagem total de links no texto da Parte 1 em exatamente 1)”. That seems to refer to Part 2, not Part 1. For Part 1, they explicitly require exactly 1 link in first or second paragraph using tag Link_afiliado. The CTA card must have its own href which is that same URL; but that would be another occurrence of the same URL but as part of HTML; does that count as another link? Probably they want that link to be the same as the one used in contextualization; i.e., we should not create a separate link; just reuse same URL inside card. But we still have two anchor tags referencing same URL – that might be considered two links. To satisfy “exactly 1 link”, we could embed the URL only in the anchor tag inside the CTA card, and not have any other anchor tags elsewhere. But they also require a link in first or second paragraph using tag Link_afiliado. That could be satisfied by placing that anchor tag inside the CTA card? No, they said it must be in first or second paragraph of contextualization. So we need an anchor tag there. Then later we also need a CTA card with its own anchor; that would be second anchor. To keep exactly one affiliate link, perhaps we can make the anchor in the contextualization paragraph be the same as the CTA card’s link? But they are separate elements; still two anchors. Maybe they intend that the CTA card’s link is not counted as an “affiliate link” because it’s part of UI element, but still a link. However they said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no primeiro ou segundo parágrafo usando a tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. So we need exactly one such link in those paragraphs. The CTA card is after that; it also contains a link but maybe they don’t consider it part of “link de afiliado contextual”? They might treat it separately; but still it’s a link with affiliation. To be safe, perhaps we can make the CTA card’s href attribute also point to same URL but we can use relative placeholder “Link_afiliado”? Actually they said replace with actual URL. That would create another anchor with same URL; but maybe they consider that okay because it’s part of mandatory UI and not counted as extra “contextual” link? The instruction ambiguous. I’ll assume we can have exactly one affiliate link overall: we will place it inside the CTA card’s href attribute (the only affiliate link). Then we must also satisfy “using tag Link_afiliado” in first or second paragraph. Perhaps we can embed that tag inside the paragraph as plain text? They said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado’ (ex: inviting the reader to conferir a disponibilidade ou recepção da obra)”. So maybe we need to include literally the string “Link_afiliado” as an anchor? Could be Link_afiliado. That would be our one affiliate link, placed in first or second paragraph. Then we must also include CTA card after contextualization, which also contains an anchor with href=”Link_afiliado”? That would duplicate. Hmm. Maybe we can embed the anchor with text “Link_afiliado” in the paragraph, and then in CTA card use same URL but not include extra anchor text? Actually CTA card already has anchor with text “Ver Amostra Grátis e Preço na Amazon”. That anchor’s href must be set to our URL. That would be another anchor but maybe considered part of required CTA and not counted as extra “link de afiliado contextual”? The rule about exactly one link might refer to overall Part 1; so we cannot have two anchors. Therefore we must avoid having two anchors. Perhaps we can make the CTA card’s anchor use the same text but without adding another anchor? Not possible; it’s an tag. Thus perhaps they expect that the only affiliate link present is within the CTA card, and we should not add any other affiliate links elsewhere; but they also require using tag Link_afiliado in first or second paragraph – maybe that refers to placing the placeholder text “Link_afiliado” as plain text, not an actual hyperlink? Could be they want us to literally write something?? No. Given ambiguity, I think safest: Include exactly one tag with href set to URL inside the first paragraph (or second). Then for CTA card, we must still include an tag; but maybe we can make its href attribute also point to same URL but not count as an extra link because it’s within same element? But still there will be two tags. We need to produce the second part of an analytical review for the book “Nossa Pior Mentira” by Elly Mello. Follow strict formatting: Use only HTML tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, . No markdown, no h1. Use bold for key concepts at start of sentences. Each paragraph max 3 lines (i.e., short). Include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Exactly 1 affiliate link in the entire text, placed in last paragraph of the first section (PERFIL DO LEITOR, CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO E CONCLUSÃO EDITORIAL). Must use tag “Link_afiliado” as href value? They said use tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando o leitor a verificar avaliações ou conferir ofertas). Probably the href should be the provided link: https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ . Must embed as contextual link. Must also have exactly 1 CTA button in the card HTML, which already includes a link with href=”Link_afiliado”. That is separate from the affiliate link in the editorial section? They said exactly 1 link of affiliate in the text and 1 CTA button in the card. The CTA button uses href=”Link_afiliado”. That’s okay; it’s a placeholder. We need to include that exact HTML block at end. We need to produce SECTION 1: PERFIL DO LEITOR, CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO E CONCLUSÃO EDITORIAL (300-650 words). Must be within 300-650 words. Must have bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Use bold at start of sentences for key concepts. Must not repeat info from earlier. Must not have intro greetings. Must go straight to info. We must ensure each paragraph max 3 lines of text. In plain text, line breaks maybe not counted; but we can keep each paragraph short, maybe 1-2 sentences. We need bullet lists with markers (- ) every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph 2, we insert a bullet list, then continue. We need exactly 1 affiliate link in the last paragraph of this section, using tag “Link_afiliado”. So the href should be “Link_afiliado”? Actually they said use the tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando o leitor a verificar avaliações ou conferir ofertas). Probably we need to write something like Link_afiliado? Or just use the placeholder “Link_afiliado”? The instruction: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual de afiliado no último parágrafo desta seção usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando o leitor a verificar avaliações ou conferir ofertas).” So we need to embed a link with href maybe set to that placeholder? Probably they want the anchor text “Link_afiliado”. But they also said earlier: “É TERMINANTEMENTE PROIBIDO inventar, deduzir ou chutar URLs (Ex: sites com finais .com.br falsos). Se a pergunta exigir a indicação do site oficial, utilize OBRIGATORIEDADE a URL exata contida no campo: [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL].” So we must use the exact URL provided: https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ. So we need to include that URL as the href of the affiliate link. And the anchor text can be something like “verificar avaliações” or “conferir ofertas”. But they specifically say use the tag “Link_afiliado”. That might mean the anchor text should be exactly “Link_afiliado”. But that seems odd. In previous tasks they used Link_afiliado. I think we should output Link_afiliado as the contextual affiliate link. That satisfies both using exact URL and tag “Link_afiliado”. So in the last paragraph we will have something like “Para conferir avaliações e ofertas, acesse Link_afiliado.” Now we need to produce the CARD HTML block at the end, which includes exactly 1 CTA button and no internal links besides that button (which already has href=”Link_afiliado”). The card block must be inserted after the editorial section. The card block includes its own link with href=”Link_afiliado”. That’s okay; it’s separate from the affiliate link in the editorial section? They said exactly 1 link of afiliado in the text and 1 CTA button in the card HTML. So we must have exactly one affiliate link somewhere in the entire response. The CTA button uses href=”Link_afiliado” which is a placeholder; but it’s also a link. Does that count as a link? It is a link but not necessarily an affiliate link? It references Link_afiliado variable which presumably points to the same URL. Might be considered a link but not an actual URL; but they said exactly 1 link of afiliado contextual in the text, and 1 CTA button in the card HTML. So we can have the CTA button with href=”https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ” as well? But that would add another affiliate link, making two. However they said exactly 1 link of afiliado contextual in the text, and 1 CTA button in the card HTML (which presumably uses that same link). The CTA button is part of the card HTML; it’s a link but maybe not counted as “link de afiliado contextual”? It might be considered part of the card, not part of the editorial section. The rule says: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no texto e 1 botão CTA no card HTML.” So we need exactly one affiliate link somewhere in the entire response (presumably within the editorial section). The CTA button is separate and can use that same link? But that would be another link (the same URL). Might be okay because it’s not “contextual”? It is part of card but still a link. The instruction says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado contextual no texto”. The CTA button is not “no texto”, it’s in HTML block; maybe they consider that separate and allowed. So we can have the affiliate link only in the last paragraph of the editorial section, and then in the CTA button we can use href=”Link_afiliado” placeholder (no actual URL). That would avoid extra affiliate link. But they also said “Se a pergunta exigir a indicação do site oficial, utilize OBRIGATORIEDADE a URL exata contida no campo: [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL].” That suggests we must use that exact URL when indicating official site. In our case, we are indicating it via affiliate link; we should use that exact URL. So we should use that URL for the affiliate link. The CTA button could also use that URL? But then we would have two links with same URL; that might be okay but might violate exactly 1 affiliate link? It might be considered two links but only one is affiliate? Both are affiliate? The CTA button might be considered not “contextual”? It’s still a link to Amazon; maybe considered affiliate as well. To be safe, I think we should place the exact URL only in the affiliate link inside the editorial section, and for the CTA button we can use href=”https://link.amazon/B0gHCz5VQ” as well? That would duplicate. Better to keep CTA button href=”Link_afiliado” placeholder as they defined, which is not an actual URL; it’s just a placeholder token. That way we only have one actual affiliate link (the one in editorial). The CTA button uses placeholder, not an actual URL, thus not an affiliate link. That satisfies rules. Now format: Use only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, . No other tags like etc? They said only those tags. But the card HTML includes many tags like,,
,
,,- , ,
,,, . Do não use markdown ou h1.” So we cannot use,, etc. But they explicitly gave a block of HTML for the card with those tags. There’s conflict. However instruction says to insert that exact block HTML responsively, which includes tags not listed allowed? The allowed tags list seems contradictory. Possibly they want us to output that block exactly as given, even though it includes tags not listed; maybe they consider those allowed because they gave it explicitly. I think we must output that block exactly as provided, including its internal tags. They said “Insira o seguinte bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA e nenhum link no texto interno do card)”. So we must include that block exactly, including its inner tags like,, etc. So we must include those tags even though earlier rule said only certain tags; but probably they want us to include that block as is. We’ll output it exactly. Now structure: We need to produce SECTION 1 (PERFIL DO LEITOR…), then SECTION 2 (CARD). They said “Escreva o bloco de continuidade baseado estritamente na diretriz acima.” So we should output both sections. We must ensure bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph
Descubra mais sobre Curso.blog.br
Assine para receber nossas notícias mais recentes por e-mail.
| , | ,
|
|---|
