Vingança por Contrato – Isabella Innamorato | Resenha

,

,

,
• , ,
  ,,

  ,

  , .” This is a rule that says you must write exclusively using those tags. So you cannot use or . But they also gave a CTA block with those tags. This is contradictory. In such ambiguous cases, we might need to adapt the CTA block to only use allowed tags. But they said “Insira o bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA):” and gave the code. They didn’t say “you must copy exactly”. They said “Insira o bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA):” and then gave the code. So we should insert that block. Probably they expect us to copy it exactly, even though it uses and . The earlier rule might be a generic rule but they gave an explicit block that uses other tags; maybe they consider those allowed because they are part of the block. Thus I think we should output the CTA block exactly as given, including , , , . That will violate the earlier rule but maybe it’s acceptable because it’s part of the required block. Now we need to produce the first part: contextualization (200-350 words) with bullet points every 2 paragraphs, exactly 1 affiliate link using tag “Link_afiliado”. The link must be exactly the URL: https://link.amazon/B00t3GWZU. And we must use the tag “Link_afiliado”? Actually they said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando para conferir a edição).” That suggests we should wrap the link in a tag named “Link_afiliado”? Or just use the URL? Probably they want an tag with the URL and maybe some text, but they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. That could mean we should use Link_afiliado? Or maybe they want the anchor text to be “Link_afiliado”? The example: “ex: convidando para conferir a edição”. So we can embed a link like conferir a edição. But they said “using the tag ‘Link_afiliado'”. Could be they want to use ? That’s not a standard tag. Probably they want to use the URL as the link text? Hmm. Given the instructions: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando para conferir a edição).” I think they want something like We need to produce HTML only, with no intro, directly in the requested block. The user wants the second part of the review focusing on editorial closing, cost-benefit analysis, signals of authority/trust (E-E-A-T). Must follow strict structure: each paragraph max 3 lines of text. Use bullet points every 2 paragraphs at minimum. Use bold for main terms. Use exactly 1 affiliate link in this section (the link provided: https://link.amazon/B00t3GWZU). Also need exactly 1 CTA button in the final editorial card HTML, which is already provided but we need to include it. The CTA button must have href = Link_afiliado (the same link). Must be exactly 1 link of affiliate in the text final of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. The CTA button is also a link, but they said exactly 1 link of afiliado in the text final of this section using the tag “Link_afiliado”. Probably they want the href to be that URL. The CTA button uses that href. That counts as the link. Must not have any other affiliate links. We need to produce the block of continuation based strictly on the directive. So we need to output HTML containing the second part: cost-benefit analysis (300-600 words) with constraints: each paragraph max 3 lines, bullet points every 2 paragraphs at minimum. Use bold for main terms. Include a short FAQ with 3 questions in bold, using escaneable markup. Include exactly 1 link contextual in the final of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. Also need to insert the editorial card final with CTA button (the HTML snippet provided). That card must be included at the end? The directive says “CARD DE VEREDITO EDITORIAL FINAL COM CTA: Insert the responsive HTML block (contains exactly 1 CTA button)”. So we need to output that card after the analysis. The card includes its own link (the same affiliate link). That would be another affiliate link, but they said exactly 1 link of afiliado in the text final of this section using the tag “Link_afiliado”. The card includes a link; that might count as the same link, but we must ensure we only have one affiliate link total. The card’s link uses the same URL; that’s okay as it’s the same link. But we must not add any other affiliate links elsewhere. We must not use markdown; only HTML tags: , , , , , ,, , . No , no markdown. Use for bold. Use for bullet points. We need to ensure each paragraph max 3 lines of text. In HTML, a line break is not explicit; but we can consider each as a paragraph. Must keep each with max 3 lines; but we can just keep short sentences. We need bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So structure: Paragraph1, Paragraph2, then bullet list (ul) maybe after second paragraph? Actually bullet points must be inserted at least every 2 paragraphs. So after every two paragraphs, we need a bullet list. Could be a with items. That counts as a bullet point section. Should we wrap bullet list in ? Yes. We need to keep paragraphs short, max 3 lines. We’ll write each with maybe 1-2 sentences, short. We need to produce 300-600 words total for this section. That’s a lot of paragraphs. But each paragraph max 3 lines; we can approximate word count. 300-600 words is about 20-30 paragraphs of ~15-20 words each. That’s doable. We need to include FAQ with 3 questions in bold. Use for questions? They said “perguntas em negrito”. So we can wrap each question in . Probably each question as a separate or part of a list? Use Pergunta? Resposta. . We need to include exactly 1 link contextual in the text final of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. That likely means the CTA button’s href should be that URL, and we should reference it as “Link_afiliado”. In the card, they already have href=”Link_afiliado”. So we must replace that placeholder with the actual URL. So the button’s href should be “https://link.amazon/B00t3GWZU”. And we must not have any other affiliate links. We must not use any other HTML tags besides allowed ones. The card uses , , , , etc. Those are allowed? The allowed tags list includes ? Actually they said only allowed tags: , , , , , ,, , . They didn’t list , , , etc. But the card snippet includes those tags. The directive says “Insira o bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA):” and then gives the HTML snippet. So we must output that snippet exactly, including , , , , etc. The earlier instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: , , , , , ,, , . Do not use markdown or h1.” That seems contradictory: they allow only those tags, but the card uses , , , etc. However the card is explicitly provided, so we must include it as is. Probably they allow those tags within the card. The overall instruction “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: …” maybe refers to the rest of the content, but the card is an exception. We’ll output the card exactly as given, but replace the href placeholder with the actual link. We must not add any extra text before or after. Just the block of continuation. Thus output should be HTML containing: – The cost-benefit analysis section with paragraphs and bullet points, FAQ, etc. – Then the editorial card HTML with CTA button. We must ensure we have exactly 1 affiliate link in the text final of this section. The card’s button is that link. So we must not include any other tags elsewhere. We must ensure bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So we can structure as: Paragraph1 Paragraph2 Bullet1 Bullet2 Paragraph3 Paragraph4 Bullet3 … and so on. We need to include FAQ: three questions in bold. Could be separate Pergunta? Resposta. each. We need to keep each paragraph max 3 lines; we can keep them short. We need to keep total words 300-600. Let’s approximate: We’ll write maybe 12 paragraphs of ~25 words each = 300 words. That’s okay. We need to include bold for main terms. Use around main terms like “custo‑benefício”, “E‑E‑A‑T”, “leitor ideal”, etc. We must not repeat information from the beginning. The beginning likely introduced the book; we should not repeat that. Now craft the content. We’ll start with a heading? They said no h1, but we can use maybe for section title? Not required. Could just start with paragraphs. We need to include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Let’s plan paragraphs sequence: 1. Paragraph about target reader and who should ignore. 2. Paragraph about common expectation errors. 3. Bullet list (maybe 2 bullets) as required every 2 paragraphs. 4. Paragraph about FAQ intro. 5. Paragraph with first FAQ question. 6. Paragraph with second FAQ question. 7. Paragraph with third FAQ question. 8. Paragraph about authority signals. 9. Paragraph about trust signals. 10. Bullet list again. 11. Paragraph concluding with link? Actually we need exactly 1 link in the final of this section; that will be the CTA button, not in the paragraph text. So we can have a paragraph that says something like “Para saber mais, veja o link afiliado.” But we cannot use elsewhere. So we must avoid any other tags. The only link is in the CTA button. So we should not embed a link in the paragraph text. The instruction: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto final desta seção usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.”. That suggests we need to have a link in the text final of this section, maybe within a paragraph before the card. But we also have the CTA button which is a link. That might satisfy the requirement. But they said “no texto final desta seção”. The final of this section likely is the card. The card contains the link. So we can just have the card as the final part, and the link inside it is the only affiliate link. That should satisfy. Thus we should not add any other tags. Now bullet points: Use … . Must be inserted at least every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph2, we put bullet list. After paragraph4, another bullet list, etc. We need to ensure each paragraph max 3 lines; we can keep them short. Now write content. Let’s draft paragraphs: Paragraph1: “ Leitor ideal busca narrativas de romance contemporâneo com carga emocional e reviravoltas de poder. ” Paragraph2: “ O público que espera um manual de negócios ou desenvolvimento pessoal pode se sentir desorientado. ” Bullet list after 2 paragraphs: maybe 2 Compartilhe isso: Facebook X Relacionado Descubra mais sobre Curso.blog.br Assine para receber nossas notícias mais recentes por e-mail. Digite seu e-mail… Assinar