O Marido que eu (Não) Queria: Adriana Brasil | Veredito

.” That excludes . So we cannot output that CTA block as given because it contains . However they explicitly gave the CTA block to insert immediately after contextualization. So we must output that block exactly, even though it uses . The earlier rule about allowed tags might be superseded by the CTA block requirement. Probably they want us to output that block exactly, including the tag. The allowed tags list might be for the rest of the content, but the CTA block is predefined and includes . We’ll follow the CTA block as given. Thus we need to output: – First part: Resposta direta & contextualização (200-350 words). Must start with a

tag. Must include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Must insert exactly 1 affiliate link using the URL. Must not use H2 or H3 in this intro. Must end with the CTA card HTML immediately after. – Then after that, we need to produce the rest: “ANÁLISE TEMÁTICA & GANHO DE INFORMAÇÃO (Entre 900 e 1500 palavras)” with 4-6 H2 blocks, bullet points every 2 paragraphs, etc. But the user only asked: “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo

de contextualização.” So they want the entire block? The instruction: “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo

de contextualização.” That suggests we need to produce the whole block (including contextualization, bullet points, CTA, then thematic analysis). Probably they want the entire first part (the “Resposta direta & contextualização” section) only? Actually they said “Gere a PRIMEIRA PARTE de uma resenha analítica…”. Then they gave structure: 1. RESPOSTA DIRETA & CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO (Between 200-350 words). Then CARD CTA. Then 3. ANÁLISE TEMÁTICA & GANHO DE INFORMAÇÃO (Between 900-1500 words). Then they say “Escreva o bloco baseado estritamente na diretriz fornecida acima, iniciando obrigatoriamente com a abertura de um parágrafo

de contextualização.” So they want the whole block (including all sections) starting with a

. So we need to produce the entire block: contextualization paragraph, bullet points, CTA card, then thematic analysis sections with H2 headings, bullet points, tables etc. Must stay within word limits: contextualization 200-350 words, analysis 900-1500 words. That’s a lot. We need to produce a fairly long answer. We must obey the bullet point rule: Insert a list of bullet points every 2 paragraphs, at least. So after every 2 paragraphs, we need a

• … etc. Probably we can add bullet points after paragraph 2, 4, 6, etc. We must use bold at the beginning of paragraphs to highlight key concepts. Use at start. We must not use H1, only H3 allowed in CTA block. In thematic analysis we need H2 headings. They said “Crie de 4 a 6 blocos temáticos com títulos H2 claros.” So we need
  

  tags? But allowed tags list does not include

  . However earlier they said allowed tags:

  ,

  ,

  ,
  • , ,
    ,,

    ,

    , . No . But they explicitly require H2 headings. Conflict. Maybe they meant is allowed, but they said H2. However allowed tags list includes but not . So we cannot use . But they require H2. Possibly they want us to use as heading? But they said H2. This is contradictory. However the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” list includes but not . So we can only use . Maybe we can use for headings. They said “títulos H2 claros”. But we can use as closest allowed. Might be okay. We also need to include a table, matrix, or placar editorial as visual element. Use etc. We must not add any extra affiliate links besides the one in contextualization. The CTA block already contains a link with the URL; that’s the required affiliate link. But they also said we must insert exactly 1 link contextual in the text using the tag “Link_afiliado”. That might be the same link? The CTA block includes a link with href=”Link_afiliado”. That is the affiliate link. So we have exactly one link (the CTA). But they also said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto usando a tag “Link_afiliado””. That could be the same link inside the CTA? But they said “no texto”. The CTA is not “texto”? It’s a block. Might be okay. We must ensure we have exactly 1 affiliate link in the whole output? The CTA block includes a link; that’s the only one. So we should not add any other tags. The bullet points etc must not contain links. We must ensure we use the exact URL: https://link.amazon/B0g6lB5qJ . In the CTA block they gave href=”Link_afiliado”. We need to replace with the actual URL. So we will put href=”https://link.amazon/B0g6lB5qJ”. That will be the only link. We must not add any other links. We must ensure bullet points are inserted every 2 paragraphs. We’ll need to count paragraphs. Paragraphs are separated by tags. So we need to produce a We need to produce second part of review focusing on closing editorial, cost-benefit analysis, E-E-A-T, etc. Must obey strict rules: – Use only HTML tags: , , , , , ,, , . No markdown or h1. So we can use . Also we need exactly 1 link of affiliate in the whole block of responses (the entire block of continuation). Also need exactly 1 button in the card HTML (the card is already given? Actually we need to generate the block of continuation based on the directive. The directive includes the card HTML which must be included as final block. That card already contains a link with href=”Link_afiliado”. We must replace that with the exact URL from [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL] which is https://link.amazon/B0g6lB5qJ. Must use exactly that URL. Also need to include exactly 1 link of affiliate in the text final of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. Wait there is confusion: In rules, “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto final desta seção usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” That suggests within the section (PERFIL DE COMPATIBILIDADE E CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO) we need to insert exactly 1 link contextual using the tag “Link_afiliado”. But also later we have CARD with a link. That also is a link. The instruction says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado no texto final desta seção usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” This likely refers to the link inside the card? Actually the card has a link with href=”Link_afiliado”. That placeholder must be replaced with the actual URL. That’s the only link allowed? But they also said “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto final desta seção usando a tag “Link_afiliado”.” That might refer to the same link inside the card. So we must have exactly one affiliate link in the entire response, which will be placed in the card’s href attribute. No other links anywhere else. So we must not add any other tags elsewhere. Also we must not invent URLs. So we must use exactly the given URL. We must produce HTML only with allowed tags. Must not use markdown. Must not use h1. Use for headings. We need to produce the second part of the review focusing on closing editorial, analysis of cost-benefit and signals of authority/trust (E-E-A-T). Must have paragraph limit: each paragraph max 3 lines of text. Use bullet points every 2 paragraphs, at least. Use bold for main terms. Use small blocks. We need to include a FAQ with 3 questions in bold using markup. Probably as Question? but need bullet points? They said “FAQ contextual curto (3 perguntas mais buscadas sobre o livro) usando marcação escaneável com perguntas em negrito.” Could be a list of with bold questions. Use Pergunta? Resposta . Must keep bullet points every 2 paragraphs. We need to respect paragraph limit: each paragraph max 3 lines. In HTML, line breaks are not explicit; but we can assume that a paragraph is a block of text separated by . We must ensure each contains no more than 3 lines of text. Hard to enforce but we can keep sentences short. We must include bullet points at every 2 paragraphs, minimum. So structure: Paragraph1, Paragraph2, then bullet list ( … ), then Paragraph3, Paragraph4, then bullet list again, etc. We need to include exactly 1 link of affiliate in the whole block. That will be inside the card’s href attribute. So we must not add any other tags. The card itself includes a link; that’s the only link. So we must not add any other link in the text. Also we must not add any other tags elsewhere. We need to include exactly 1 button in the card HTML. The card HTML is provided; we must output it exactly but replace href with the actual URL. Also we must keep the button text as given. Ensure we keep the same attributes. We must not use any other HTML tags beyond allowed ones. The card uses , , , , etc. is not in allowed list! Wait allowed tags: , , , , , ,, , . They said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: , , , , , ,, , . Do não use markdown ou h1.” They didn’t mention , , , etc. But the card HTML includes , , , etc. However the instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE em HTML limpo usando: , , , , , ,, , . Do não use markdown ou h1.” This seems contradictory because the card includes , , , etc. Perhaps they allow those as part of the card? The instruction might be that the overall response must be HTML using only those tags, but the card is part of the response and includes other tags. However they explicitly said “Do não use markdown ou h1.” They didn’t forbid or . But they said “using: , , , , , ,, , .” That suggests only those tags are allowed. But the card includes , , , etc. Maybe they expect us to output the card exactly as given, which includes those tags, but that would violate the rule. However the instruction says “Insira o bloco HTML responsivo (contém EXATAMENTE 1 botão CTA):” and then shows the card HTML. So we must output that block exactly, which includes , , , , etc. So we must include those tags despite the earlier restriction. Probably the earlier restriction is for the rest of the content, but the card is allowed to have those tags. So we can output the card as is, with the required modifications. Thus we will output the entire continuation: first the PERFIL DE COMPATIBILIDADE E CUSTO-BENEFÍCIO section (300-600 words) with bullet points every 2 paragraphs, using allowed tags. Then the CARD block with the link. We must ensure exactly 1 affiliate link in the whole response, which will be the href in the card’s tag. So we must not include any other tags elsewhere. Also we must not include any other link in the text. So we must not add any other tags. We must also ensure we have exactly 1 link contextual in the text final of this section using tag “Link_afiliado”. That likely refers to the link in the card. So we will replace the placeholder href with the actual URL. Now we need to craft the content. We need to produce about 300-600 words for the cost-benefit analysis section. Must be broken into paragraphs of max 3 lines each. Use bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Use bold for main terms. We need to include a FAQ with 3 questions in bold. Could be bullet points with bold questions. We need to include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So structure: Paragraph1 (max 3 lines) Paragraph2 (max 3 lines) Bullet1 Bullet2 Paragraph3 Paragraph4 Bullet3 Bullet4 Paragraph5 Paragraph6 … etc. We need to keep each paragraph short, max 3 lines. We’ll keep each paragraph maybe 2-3 sentences. We need to include bold for main terms. Use . We need to include a FAQ with 3 questions in bold. Could be part of bullet list or separate paragraphs. Probably we can include them as bullet points with bold questions. We need to keep total words 300-600. Let’s aim for about 350-400 words. We must not exceed 3 lines per paragraph. In HTML, line breaks are not explicit; but we can assume that a paragraph with a few sentences will be within 3 lines. We’ll keep each paragraph short. We must not use any other tags besides allowed ones (plus the card’s tags). So we can use , , , , , ,, , . For FAQ we can use Pergunta? Resposta . That uses , , . We need to include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph2 we put a bullet list. After paragraph4 we put another bullet list, etc. We need to include exactly 1 link in the card. So we will output the card HTML with href replaced by the given URL. Now craft content. First, maybe a heading PERFIL DE COMPATIBILIDADE E CUSTO‑BENEFÍCIO but h3 is allowed. Use . Then paragraphs. Paragraph1: talk about who is the ideal reader. Paragraph2: talk about who should ignore. Then bullet list with maybe “Quem deve ignorar:” bullet points. Then Paragraph3: talk about common expectation errors. Paragraph4: maybe talk about theoretical vs practical. Then bullet list again. Then Paragraph5: maybe talk about E-E-A-T signals. Paragraph Compartilhe isso: Facebook X Relacionado Neste artigo Toggle Descubra mais sobre Curso.blog.br Assine para receber nossas notícias mais recentes por e-mail. Digite seu e-mail… Assinar